Subject:

Comments:
: I have often wondered: why do physicists see the beginnings of the universe as originating from 'positive matter', albeit infinitely small (somewhat like believing that positive matter is the centre of the universe, or 'all' there is to begin from). The general category of positive matter (at least in my uninformed imagination) might simply be conceived of as being twice or more as voluminous in an identical amount of space as a corresponding form of negative matter (not going into specific particle formations of either, ie.just talking generally). Imagine a flat uniform batch of matter/or space (ie. there are no distinctions in it). It is neither positive or negative until unity is broken and one part (of this space) exceeds another in volume by at least itself again. Thus imagine plucking the earth out of existence (as a thought experiment), there must still be remaining in place of the earth negative matter to make that space uniform to the space outside of where the earth was. Or does there? Perhaps the positive matter of earth (in comparison to the negative vacuum of empty space)is only conceivable as an excess of vacuum on top of that base vacuum plus the base vacuum to be measured as positive (comparatively) at all. As the earth is taken out of existence there perhaps would rather exist in its place a much stronger vacuum (as much again at least, and more) to the surrounding empty space. So called 'space' would implode into the greater vacuum creating an (infinite?) wave in space. Hypothesis: one phase of the universe is an empty ball of space (negative matter). It begins to stretch out and according to the natural expansion laws of this geometric figure the volume of the outer and the inner become differentiated, positive and negative matter. These different areas of volume, expanding according to the same rules, also each become differential volumes as they expand and so on. Equivalent levels of volume move at equivalent (though in relevant cases - opposite) speeds and directions. Opposing waves of positive/negative volume interact in the corresponding opposite manner to differentiation, becoming sets or greater particles. : Another query: what do scientists believe is happening when positive matter aculates from space dust to greater and greater astrological entities? A stable amount of positive matter in all the planets that is attracting each other constantly must mean fewer, but bigger planets (ie.there now must be less planets than there were initial numbers of space dust particles). Does this mean that eventually there will be only two bloody big planets circling each other. And then perhaps only one. To take the scenario further, perhaps then an outer(and shrinking)positive crust, and an inner (and expanding) negative vacuum. What would be outside the core? Perhaps absolutely zero. And as the crust diminishes to nothing - voila, a ball of uniform negative vacuum. Which - just as positive matter has a tendency to motion when surrounded by negative matter - is inclined to spill outwards when also surrounded by nothing. I do not know if this scenario makes sense to anybody but myself. I imagine this scenario pushes the concept of infinity right out of the current phase of the universe and suggests simply a perpetual motion of finite dissolving and coagulating mathematical distinctions. Please feel free to ridicule these pretensions as I do not really 'own' them. It would be interesting to here what might be said about them, however.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: