Subject:

Comments:
: : : : I have several problems (of which I'm looking for an answer for) in the current theories of general relitivity and quantum mechanics. If I can not find an answer to these problems, then I have developed a super-string similar theory: : : Many faults can be found in both the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. : : In quantum mechanics what makes the electron know wether or not to release a real photon : : how do electrons know where to emit their virtual particles (i.e. how do they know that an electron is just next to them) : : These electrons are protrayed to communicate with each other, but electrons are not super-intelligent, they don't have conversationations at the local cafe. : : In general relativity space is supposed to be bent, but space is nothing, how an nothing be warped. Scientists are trying to find out why by fluke did the universe start out in such a smooth uniform space. An answer is that the expansion would smooth out the universe, but then our Earth would be smoothing out the space around the Sun and therefore would quickly break from its orbit and be hurled into space. : : NOTE:I call my theory the liquid web theory after my original theory. In my theory the universe is described as a sea of energy in which all particles are just fluctuations in density in the sea. "Negative energy" may also be thought as less then normal density of energy : : A theory that may explain all these questions may be my "liquid web theorie". In this theory there are two types of energy: positive and negative. Up quarks are positive and down quarks are negative. Energy cannot fit on an electron so it would appear thus. In this everything is apart. In a real electron they would be concentrated into a ball but the outer energy would extend fairly far (like any liquid poured onto a surface (say a bowl) would spread out as far as possible, however energy would be denser around the centre of the matter particle and density would decrease as you get further from the center) some energy would be squeezd out of the gluons in the centre of the matter particle, and this energy would be replenished by energy released by other matter particles. : : From here I have developed two theories and I am unsure which to follow up but here are them both: : : 1. The released energy is half a photon. To make a photon you need either one +ve emission and one -ve emission. This makes a neutral photon but there are two other types of photons called unbalanced photons (two +ves/two -ves) which causes an "explosion" (not literately) of light. Electrons release +ve energy (making the electron -vely charged (keep in mind that the charge of the replenishing energy is random). If two electrons get too close together a posiphoton is made causing repulsion due to the "explosion". A proton and electron don't really attract but when they get close they join like two touching water droplets and the become 1, but not totally it would look more like this two water droplets merged into one droplet. They cannot merge completely together because of the dense energy in the middle. However when the neutraphoton was made it would contribute to the dense energy. When the proton and electron go close together the neutraphoton is released which we can detect as light. : : Now you may be wondering why protons and electrons would want to get closer together and why the universe doesn't quickly collapse into a uniformly dense "soup" and another thing, how does the electron know where to emit its half photon? : : Well in answer to the first question imagine a tennis ball entering a sea of energy, at the for a while there might be an extremely small resistance to get through the energy but not enough even to slow the tennis ball down. As the tennis ball gets past some point there is more energy behind it then in front, and more is squeezing it towards the atom than away and the tennis ball begins to feel force. Only when the tennis ball is close enough to the atom will the force become significant. This explains why this force is short ranged. : : In answer to the second question remember that positives and negatives repel and have to keep a certain distance away from each other or consistent posiphoton would be emitted. In addition no electron may get closer than any other electron because they would all be attracted at the same rate and would start to move towards the protons in the middle of the atom but posiphotons would be made and the electrons would be repelled back only to be attracted back to the protons in the nucleus of the atom. Thus the electrons would travel in waves. : : In answer to the third and final question, I have two answers for this: my first answer is that as the electrons spin it releases half photons (or semi-photons) at a speed that depends on the speed of which it gains energy, so there may be a time delay but the electrons will very quickly make a posiphoton causing repulsion. This makes a prediction about the origin of matter. Before the first semi-photon was emitted electrons would not have repelled but in fact would have attracted, which would have made it easy for electrons and protons to group together to form atoms. However if there is no time delay then there is an alternate theory: : : 2. When 2 electrons get too close together and their energy radii overlaps the over lapping part makes a posiphoton and repels the two electrons. However when two differently charged particles overlap a neutraphoton is made, but this does not cause repulsion but just joins the particles like two touching droplets of water (other wise a continuous stream of photons would be emitted annihilating both matter particles!). This leaves out just one force, gravity. Imagine : : the universe as a sea of energy, out side the universe there is still energy for a certain distance as the bodies on the edge of the universe would emit energy which would go for a large distance. This sea of energy would have to make room for any object in the sea. Therefore around this object (say a tennis ball) the energy would be concentrated, remember my theory on the attraction between 2 differently charged particles being caused by the sea of energy squeezing the particles together? Well this is similar only on a larger scale and the principle of the Earth held in orbit around the Sun would still be because of centrifugal force. The theory also explains why gravity is so long range, it also explains why gravity is so weak but why the rate it gets stronger in proportion to m may increase, This is because in a sea of energy a small increase would make little or no change in the density around it for example, the ratio may be 3:2 and before it may of been say 0:2 the increase in energy is only 150%, but as the change gets larger the ratio may be 4:2 and the increase maybe 200% while you have only increased the ratio by 1 on the left side. Another causes of the acceleration of the increase are that the sea of energy would have to make room for the object and therefore the density of the energy would be increased in addition to the emitted energy. : : This theory predicts that there is no real difference between all four forces in the universe since one is the cause of another. Therefore there may be a way of using the electromagnetic force as a gravitational force, the gravitational force as the strong nuclear force etc.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[Nantuckets.com][BusinessPhilosophy.com][Classicals.com] [Nantucket Poetry Postcards]
[Nantucket Navy Live Chat][The Jolly Roger][Kill Devil Hill][Western Canon University][Federalistnavy.com Spirit of America]
[Starbuck.com Clical Poetry Port] [Kill Devil Hill] [Shakespearean Greetings]
[Conservative Cafe][nantucketnavy.com][hatteraslight.com]
Re: queries on quantum mechanics and general relativity: Nantucket Campfire

Nantucket Campfire
& Other Nantucket Live Chats
If ye would like to moderate the Nantucket Campfire, please drop nantucket@nantuckets.com a line.