Posted by Wayne on August 04, 19103 at 13:05:11:

In Reply to: Re: Acts versus Galatians posted by whirlingmerc on February 20, 19103 at 16:15:52:

It's to bad that this site does not inform one when there is a reply to their thread. Nevertheless, I've noticed that you refer to an article by James Patrick Holding. Regarding him as a Biblical scholar should be balanced with the following critical reviews of his scholarship:

Turkel and the Trilemma
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/brian_holtz/trilemma_holtz.shtml

The Humpty Dumpty of Biblical Apologetics
http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/2002/5/025hump.html

'James Patrick Holding,' the Want-to-Be Apologist
http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/2002/4/024jph.html

Later today I'll look at your argument more completely and if it is relying on the use of exegesis to overcome my argument, I'll reject it! Because:

1. No truthful person would use that method to try and reconcile two secular doents if they were contradicting one another.

2. My argument can not be overcome except by the use of exegesis.

Exegesis: "explanation, to lead, explain, guide, critical ysis, or interpretation of a word, or literary page, ect., esp. IN THE BIBLE" (Webster's New World College Dictionary 4th Edition).

Follow Ups:

• Re: Acts versus Galatians esther 08:37:28 3/15/104 (0)
• Re: Acts versus Galatians Wayne 14:13:32 8/04/103 (0)

Post a Followup